JUST READ!

---

DAP, the dynasty Posted: 24 Sep 2013 08:48 PM PDT DAP is not a democratic party, and will never become one like Umno, MCA or MIC. DAP is 'owned' by Lim Dynasty; others in the party are there only to serve them. Why? Read this: 1.   While other political parties like Umno, MCA and MIC saw changes to its top leadership since Merdeka, DAP retains Lim Kit Siang as the supreme leader. Nobody dared to contest this, let alone challenge Lim to step down. 2.   Umno, MCA and others hold direct elections with, for and by members for all positions in the party. In the DAP, however, office-bearers were chosen by a 20-member central executive committee (CEC) which had been elected by delegates. Technically, a CEC member who may have finished at 20th position, needed only 11 votes to hold a top position like chairman and secretary-general.  3.   Compared to DAP, Umno and MCA do not sack any member without holding an internal inquiry, in which the affected person would be given all avenues to defend. But scores of DAP members had been expelled without even showcause letters. Even many members did not receive notice of EGM or general assembly. 4.   Between 1968 until today, Umno (for instance) had had six presidents, while the DAP only lived under a single dynastic rule. MCA too saw changes to its top brass leadership and held annual assembly. 5.   During the same period, Lim Kit Siang had held a world record by commanding a party for 45 years, including the 27 years as its secretary-general. Although many leaders of his time have quit active politics, Kim still has not called it a day, merely to safeguard his interests and hegemony in DAP. 6.   The political saga of Kerk Kim Hock, former DAP secretary-general, is a fine example of Lim Dynasty's hegemony.  Lim Kit Siang wants to place his son, Guan Eng, in the strongest position possible to continue their family dynasty in the DAP. 7.   Others in the DAP like Karpal Singh will not rise further. They are there only to serve Lim's dynasty. Karpal and sons will never get the chance to build a 'Singh empire' within DAP, and no room either for any Tan, Lee or Chua. 8.   Unlike the DAP, Umno, MCA and other parties do not deploy schoolboy tactics in blaming the error in tabulations of votes as a technical glitch (the CEC election late last year). Will DAP ensure a free, fair and clean re-election on Sunday Sept 29? 9.    Any botched electoral process this time around will lead to the party's irrelevance, and will also end the unwanted dynasty hegemony. Many believe 'Lim & Co' will resort to some tricks again to ensure that only their proxies get to the CEC. 10.  DAP is a Chinese party, a hardliner. There is no space for Malays and Indians to move up, let alone getting the votes from delegates, unless instructed by Lim.

Bar Council really sucks! Posted: 24 Sep 2013 07:28 AM PDT Who says the Bar Council is pro-government? Who should answer this? If they are pro-government, they would have supported efforts to strengthen the judiciary and introducing new laws to replaced those repealed. All these are for the country's stability and security. However, they are supportive of each and every move made by the Opposition, Bersih and other anti-government NGOs, including their plan to legalise LGBT, all on the tickets of 'human rights' and 'freedom'. And how many lawyers have yet to become members of the Council? What does this imply? KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 24 (Bernama) -- The Bar Council was criticised for being seen as having an anti-government attitude and making pro-opposition decisions and statements. Datuk Datu Nasrun Datu Mansur (BN-Silam) said as a body established under the Legal Profession Act 1976 the Bar Council was not a non-governmental organisation which could freely voice its opinions and allow its members to participate in opposition street demonstrations. He said the Bar Council had an important role as it issued practising certificates to foreign lawyers working here. "I'm concerned that if the Bar Council is authorised to approve these certificates they will only select those with the same opinions as them," he said when debating the Legal Profession Bill (Amendment) 2012 (Amendment) 2013) at the Dewan Rakyat here today. He proposed that a representative from the Attorney-General's Chambers should be automatically appointed as the council's committee member under the amendment. Datu Nasrun said such a move would enable the government to monitor the issuance of the certificates and also ensure the professional body was neutral in its actions. He said he was also given to understand that the council received a RM2 million annual allocation and urged the government to review the amount in order to ensure there was no abuse of power. Datuk Ahmad Hamzah (BN-Jasin) who welcomed the proposal also suggested that foreign lawyers wishing to form international partnerships should be subjected to a bond to prevent them from activities which were not approved. "They must have this bond so that it is revoked if they commit any offence and the company will be blacklisted," he said. The Bar Council is fast deviating from its original platform. When it was supposed to help the government regulate new laws, it members are going against the one way street, opposing to all such practice. Where would this lead them to? HELL!

You are subscribed to email updates from JUST READ! To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jom berjuang bersama rakan bloggers di Facebook!

Tunjukkan sokongan anda! Sila Like.