PISAU.NET |
- Regim Dap Pulau Pinang Rasis Saman Peniaga Sebab Mereka Melayu
- Disaster For PAS In Kelantan
- Ariff Sabri Ganti Tunku Aziz?
- Why DAP Reject Independent Panel To Investigate BERSIH 3.0?
- Nak Bunuh Semua Anggota Polis,Ketua Pengganas AMK Sik Di Tahan.
- Politik Bukan Agama.
- Manifesto DAP PRU13.
| Regim Dap Pulau Pinang Rasis Saman Peniaga Sebab Mereka Melayu Posted: 16 May 2012 07:02 AM PDT
Seluruh negara tahu Dap yang rasis,chauvanis dan ultrakiasu tidak akan sesekali mengambil tindakan terhadap peniaga cina walaupun kesalahan dilakukan terang terangan didepan mata. Lebih dari itu regim Dap pula boleh menggunakan budi bicara ikut kehendak para peniaga cina hingga jalan utama yang sesak dengan lalu lintas pun boleh ditutup asalkan para peniaga ini bebas berniaga seperti di Georgetown. Hari ini 7 penjaja kecil melahirkan rasa tidak puas hati dengan tindakan MPSP apabila disaman dan dihalau keluar dari Jalan Taman Ciku Bukit Mertajam. Kenapa MPSP tidak menyaman penjaja cina di Pekan Bukit Mertajam yang semua orang tahu sejak dari dulu lagi menghalang lalu lintas. Bertambah malang lagi apabila penjaja ini telah disaman RM200 sedangkan pendapatan mereka hanyalah sekitar 30-40 ringgit sehari. Inilah konsep sama rata yang dilaungkan oleh rasis ultrakiasu chauvanis DAP yang melayu Pulau Pinang sokong sangat.. Pisau kata "pru13 kita pangkah lagi DAP dan pakatan...sokongan anda mudahkan kerja DAP "  |
| Posted: 16 May 2012 06:00 AM PDT  Most PAS leaders still think that Kelantan is the main arch for them, the people would die for them and that the rise of UMNO can never hurt them and loyalty of rakyat towards Nik Aziz as the greatest PAS leader. Least that is what they are saying to rakyat through their endless ceramah. Lets look at these two examples which happened in about a little more than a month. These examples would show how PAS shackled their supporters especially among Kelantanese voters to vote for them. In May 12, 2012 in Pasir Puteh, Kelantan, former Selangor PAS Commissioner, Dr Hasan Ali in one of his roadshow series managed to attract more than 3,000 people which were mostly PAS supporters at Pasir Puteh. Even though a few banners and posters that tells the time and venue of the ceramah went missing a couple of days before the event, it still went with great success. Meanwhile, a ceramah that was attended by PAS's Vice President, Mat Sabu, a person that usually attracts least four to five thousand people in his events, other PAS leaders as well, has now gone sour among Kelantanese supporters. In March 29, 2012, Mat Sabu and a few Pasir Puteh PAS's leaders organized a ceramah at the Pasir Putih District hall but the attendance was quite sad. It was only around 30 people. This is quite rare considering that usually their ceramah would gain at least 100 people, except for UMNO states. Even when Nik Aziz was going through his dark days he would get at least 5,000 people compared to 10,000 regulars, but Mat Sabu managed to break the record as the first PAS leader who had 30 people listening in his ceramah. 3,000 and 30 is a huge gap. A big disaster for PAS Kelantan especially we are getting near towards the 1th General Election. This is one of the signs that shows that PAS is dying and they would be facing tough challenge for the coming election in Kelantan. There are a few things that we need to bear in mind. The signs of declining supports to PAS Kelantan is getting clearer since their close win in Manek Urai election a few years ago, followed by the red wave in the election at Galas which brought PAS down about more than a year and a half ago. And what had happened at PAS's briefing ceremony in Pasir Puteh in March was just the sequel of the decline that PAS is facing through now. If this goes on, things would be very bad for PAS and Nik Aziz. It is not impossible that in the coming GE, result of PAS Kelantan might just change. Even if they could stay in Kelantan, it might face the situation in 2004 where they barely rule the state.  |
| Posted: 16 May 2012 02:53 AM PDT  Tunku Abdul Aziz Tunku Ibrahim yang juga Naib Pengerusi DAP dan bekas Pengerusi Transparency International Malaysia yang sejak 2008 bersama DAP kerana yakin parti tersebut benar-benar telus, adil dan ikhlas memperjuangkan demokrasi berparlimen akhirnya terpaksa mengundur diri. Semuanya gara-gara perbezaan pandangannya dalam isu penganjuran demonstrasi BERSIH 3.0 yang tidak dipersetujuinya kemudian membawa kepada bantahan pemimpin atasan DAP yang menyifatkan Tunku Aziz telah melanggar prinsip kepimpinan DAP selain memalukan parti. Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang, Lim Guan Eng merangkap Setiausaha Agung DAP yang meningkat naik dalam hierarki kepimpinan parti hasil hubungan kekeluargaan dengan Lim Kit Siang (anak & ayah) merupakan antara pemimpin utama DAP yang mengkritik teguran Tunku Aziz berkaitan BERSIH 3.0. Ringkasnya, apa yang menimpa Tunku Aziz menambahkan lagi koleksi bukti dan kebenaran betapa tempangnya amalan demokrasi dalam kepimpinan DAP. Demokrasi dan kebebasan yang dilaungkan tidak lebih sekadar retorik politik. Persoalan sekarang, siapakah lagi yang akan menggantikan kekosongan dan kemudian bakal menjadi mangsa 'ketelusan dan kebebasan ala DAP' selepas Tunku Aziz mengundur diri? Adakah benar ura-ura sumber dalaman DAP yang mahu mengangkat naik bekas ahli UMNO, Ariff Sabri sebagai galang ganti kepada Tunku Aziz benar-benar akan menjadi kenyataan bagi menampakkan betapa multiracialnya DAP selain melanjutkan satu lagi episod 'ketelusan ala DAP'? Jika diambil kira dari segi strategik kepartian, Ariff Sabri boleh dikira cukup layak memandang pengalaman luasnya sebagai pemimpin pertengahan UMNO suatu ketika dulu yang jika pandai dimanfaatkan oleh DAP tentu saja memberi keuntungan politik. Pun begitu, seorang lagi Melayu liberal & berfikiran 'terbuka' iaitu Hatta Watari yang juga bekas wartawan Utusan walaupun tidak termasuk dalam senarai, juga berpeluang mengisi kekosongan jawatan 'dummy' yang ditinggalkan oleh Tunku Aziz. Siapa saja yang bakal menggantikan Tunku Aziz, keputusan muktamadnya hanya akan diketahui beberapa ketika nanti. Yang pastinya pemusatan kuasa kepimpinan sama sekali tidak akan beredar dari tangan Dinasti Lim.  |
| Why DAP Reject Independent Panel To Investigate BERSIH 3.0? Posted: 16 May 2012 01:00 AM PDT  BERSIH 3.0 is really causing trouble to the opposition. Not just that they have lost quite a number of support, they also failed to twist facts to prove that the riot was cause by the police and not rioters. From their failure, they had to accuse rioters who caused chaos were undercover police officers. For that, bloggers and news portals who support them became tired of having to justify the chaos that they have caused. To reduce the tension, the government has announced independent panel to investigate BERSIH 3.0 which later received sarcastic response from the opposition. In May 12, DAP announced a boycott on the independent panel in investigating BERSIH 3.0. It seems natural for DAP where after making various accusations to their enemies, they would push and demand for investigation. But when things have been investigated, they would make various lies to object or boycott the panel and the result if thing s do not go their way. Previously, they made the same move in the issue of the death of Teoh Beng Hock. If we are to see this closely, BERSIH issue went the same way where they accuse the EC for not being transparent, and then denied all EC's efforts to improve election system. DAP's excuse this time around is that they would not accept the appointment of Mohammad Hanif Omar as the chief panel for the investigation, on the excuse that he took a partisan stance on BERSIH when he claimed that pro-communists were involved and that he supported claim made by Prime Minister, Najib Abdul Razak that BERSIH 3.0 Assembly was a try to bring down the government. However, in accusing Tun Hanif as a partisan, DAP suggested that the government should appoint those who are less partisan such as Suhakam. DAP also supported opinion from the Bar Council where they said that the investigation panel did not have the complete legal work frame and did not provide legal immunity to those who were involved in the prosiding and did not have much power to provide subpoena to witnesses or claiming documents. The fact is, everyone is well aware that Suhakam and the Bar Council are two bodies that have never acted fair, bias, unprofessional and twisted just to defend lawbreakers and to oppose the government. Both are also in doubt where they might have relationship with foreign elements and that they may receive foreign funds. Thus, if we need to choose between two partisan sides, wouldn't it be better for us to choose Tun Hanif who is proven to be a person that has contributed a lot for the country, just, patriotic and very professional in his service to secure our nation? We do not understand why DAP need to doubt Tun Hanif but provide full trust to Suhakam and the Bar Council when the Bar Council was proven to have hidden the real facts on the chaos of BERSIH 3.0 like what was revealed by Ranjit Singh Dhillon on YouTube. The information was backed with a civil suit made by a member of the Bar Council, Mohd. Khairul Azam Abdul Aziz who claimed that the bar Council had failed to act as a professional body when within less than a five hour meeting to decide on the BERSIH 3.0 resolution, revealed clearly the scandals of lies, bias, doubt etc. It is clear here that bodies that were suggested by DAP cannot be trusted. DAP's behavior of supporting criminals, rioters and law breakers is just sad. With that, it is wrong for us to state that DAP is actually scared to be professional to let Tun Hanif lead the investigation of BERSIH 3.0. It is not impossible that DAP has something that they need to hide regarding BERSIH 3.0, just like the case of Teoh Beng Hock. Perhaps DAP is worried if their secrets on funds, mastermind and other things that are related to BERSIH 3.0 might be revealed if full investigation is led by such huge name such as Tun Hanif, a former law enforcement officer that is highly respected by all Malaysians.  |
| Nak Bunuh Semua Anggota Polis,Ketua Pengganas AMK Sik Di Tahan. Posted: 15 May 2012 11:00 PM PDT Nak bunuh Polis?Ketua Gengster AMK Sik berambut panjang ni sebenarnya disekolah dulu sering kali dibuli,mantan pengawas perpustakaan ni sebenarnya taklah berani sangat,cakap saja lebih..Bila terdedah video ni lari tak cukup tanah.. Polis hari ini mengambil keterangan Ketua Angkatan Muda Keadilan (AMK) Sik, Kedah, Ngah Habib Mahyudin, 30, susulan kenyataannya pada satu ceramah yang didakwa mempunyai unsur hasutan. Timbalan Ketua Polis Daerah Seberang Perai Tengah (SPT) Supt Baharudin Mustapha berkata pemimpin politik itu didakwa menyebut "mahu membunuh semua anggota polis yang mengambil tindakan ke atas peserta pada perhimpunan Bersih 3.0 lepas" dalam satu ceramah di Bukit Mertajam, di sini minggu lepas. Kes ini disiasat mengikut Seksyen 143 dan Seksyen 506 Kanun Keseksaan, katanya kepada pemberita di sini. Ngah Habib yang juga Pengerusi Solidariti Anak Muda Malaysia (SAMM) Kedah tiba di Ibu Pejabat Polis Daerah (IPD) SPT pada pukul 1.45 petang bersama bapa dan beberapa rakannya sebelum meninggalkan IPD itu sejam kemudian. - BERNAMA Pisau kata " depa ni semua tentera jihad Ambiga"  |
| Posted: 15 May 2012 09:00 PM PDT  Mursyidul Am Pas, Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat tidak tahu membezakan antara pandangan seorang pejuang Islam dengan pandangan orang politik apabila menyamakan kenyataan Mufti Perak, Tan Sri Harussani Zakaria sebagai pandangan berbaur politik. Mufti Negeri Sembilan, Datuk Mohd. Yusof Ahmad berkata, Nik Aziz merupakan seorang ahli politik, meskipun beliau dan partinya mahu memperjuangkan Islam tetapi matlamat parti itu tetap bercirikan politik justeru apa sahaja isu berkaitan Islam, Nik Aziz masih melihatnya sebagai politik. ''Cara orang politik menegakkan Islam berbeza dengan pejuang Islam sejati. Terutama mereka yang terbuka menerima sesiapa sahaja untuk menyertai perjuangan Islam termasuk orang yang bukan Islam. Maka, matlamat perjuangan mereka kebarangkalian mudah tersasar. ''Seorang pendakwah Islam yang baik, dia akan berusaha memperkasakan Islam itu dengan cara yang boleh memelihara kehormatan Islam. Jika dia tidak mampu berjuang seorang diri, dia akan mencari rakan Islam yang lain tetapi bukan rakan yang bukan Islam,'' katanya ketika dihubungi Utusan Malaysia di sini hari ini. Semalam, Nik Aziz menempelak pandangan Harussani terhadap Pas dengan menganggap kenyataan Mufti Perak bahawa Pas sudah menyeleweng dan menyalahgunakan agama Islam sebagai pandangan lapuk seorang mufti.-Utusan Pisau kata " Inilah masaalahnya apabila ahli politik macam nik aziz anggap agama tu sebahagian daripada politik... apa korang pun politik dengan tuhan ka?"  |
| Posted: 15 May 2012 06:00 PM PDT  Ini adalah sebahagian kehendak DAP yang mereka mahu dimasukkan didalam manifesto PRU13. Kehendak DAP sudah pasti akan dituruti oleh orang melayu pakatan.Anda harus patuh dan ikuti kehendak DAP,Jika Manifesto ini dibangkang sudah pasti anda akan dituduh sebagai rasis dan perkauman. Apa macam? Korang setuju?
Pisau kata " Melayu sekarang mana berani angkat muka,DAP pijak kepala pun boleh senyum lagi.. pertahankan hak sendiri dituduh rasis..apa lagi yang ada pada orang melayu?"  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from PISAU.NET To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Jom berjuang bersama rakan bloggers di Facebook!
Tunjukkan sokongan anda! Sila Like.
No comments:
Post a Comment