OutSyed The Box

Al Azhar PhD : Hijab Is Not Fard In Islam

Posted: 25 May 2012 11:25 PM PDT

Here is more revelation from the religious scholars themselves. This one is supposedly a thesis written by one Arab scholar, a certain Sheikh Mustafa Mohamed Rashid who submitted a PhD thesis to the Al Azhar University in Cairo.

Sheikh Mustafa Mohamed Rashid argues that the hijab is not a requirement of Islam.

Here is the article from an Arab newspaper. The title says "Al Hijaab laysa fareedat Islameeyah" which means "The hijab is not obligatory in Islam".

Folks, jangan marah saya ok. Ini bukan saya yang cakap. This is what the religious scholars are saying. Itu pun a scholar who submitted his PhD thesis on the subject to the Al Azhar University - the foremost center of learning for the Sunni religion in the entire world.

Here is an English version of Sheikh Mustafa's findings. You can search Yahoo or Google for "Sheikh Mustafa Mohamed Rashid's PhD thesis" and you can double check the article yourself. Note the words in red.

"Al Azhar endorsed Sheikh Mustafa Mohamed Rashid's PhD thesis on Sharia and Law for which he obtained a grade of excellence, where he stated that hijab is not an Islamic requirement (fard), and that the interpretation (tafseer) of the verses (ayat) and the circumstances during which they appeared has led to the widespread misunderstanding about the so-called 'Islamic Hijab' denoting covering the head, of which there is absolutely no mention in the Quran.

Yet some have misconstrued the intent and correct interpretation of the Sharia, refusing the logic and sequence of its appearance, abandoning the proper methods of citing and interpreting of the verses (ayat), their historical background and reason for them. They have done so either intentionally, or with good intention but with lack of the essential analytical savvy.

This hijab issue imposed itself on the Islamic and non-Islamic psyche, and thus becoming the defining factor, meaning, and nature of the Islamic faith to non-Muslims, which led some non-Islamic nations to consider it a divisive political statement. In consequence to the resulting friction, some female students have been expelled from universities and jobs, only due to their adherence to this false belief, thereby attaching to Islam a non existent requirement.

So inconsistent and misguided have the proofs of the supporters of the hijab theory been, that it would sometimes take the form of khimar or jalabeeb, which distanced them from what they meant by head cover, which is indicative of their restrictive set of mind. (My comments : ha ha ha ha ! ! )

'Hijab' was mentioned in verse (ayah) 53 of al Ahzab, where it signifies 'wall' or 'what prevents view' and it was in regards to pure "ummuhat al mo'mineen" where a "hajib" is to be placed between them and any men.

As for verse (ayah) 31 of Al Khimar - Sourrat al Noor, that is also a redundant claim, as the intent here is the covering of the breast and neck - the background here is the covering of the breast whose exposure is un-Islamic, and not what is now understood by hijab for the head.

And in regards to the historical background of verse (ayah) 59 of Sourrat al AHzab was to distinguish between the pure and the promiscuous whores and slaves.

Finally, in the mis-use of the Hadith about Asma'a, daughter of Abu Bakr, when she walked in on the prophet (pbuh)s gathering, and he ordered her to not expose her face or palms - this Hadith is not a binding Hadith, as it is one of al AHaad and not one of the consistent, or the connected confirmed." - End of article.

Well folks, your friendly Blogger OutSyed The Box (thats me) has been saying this for years now and without even having to go to Al Azhar University which is located in the Club of Doom.

I can also tell you that the Book of Corinthians in the Bible speaks of the headcover for women. It is a Biblical teaching. Dont believe me? Then who is this in the picture ? It is not Cik Jah. This is the late Mother Theresa wearing her trademark hijab. It is a Biblical teaching. (Please dont say that Mother Theresa took secret night classes at Al Azhar University).

There is certainly no mention of any headcover in the Quran. I have said it before but not in my Blog, that if anyone can show me the verse in the Quran which says that the woman's hair is her "aurat" or nakedness then I will eat that page. Todate no one has been able to show me any such thing in the Quran.

People have already argued that a PhD thesis is not Islamic Law. These people do not understand what Sheikh Mustafa Mohamed Rasheed has done. He is saying that the belief that hijab is part of Islamic Law has no basis. He says there is no evidence. The more relevant question is : if it is not in the Quran and the other references are questionable, then where does Islamic Law come from?

Laws made by your favorite religious scholar, by your mazhab or by your tok guru CANNOT be Islamic Law. Dont get confused.

Investment Analyst's View GE13

Posted: 25 May 2012 08:55 AM PDT

I received this in the mail. I have truncated it and edited a few words. This is what some Investment Analysts are predicting. Note the words in red.

There is a disclaimer - "J.P. M***an does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision."

The upcoming 13th General Elections (June/Sept possible) is the key market risk.

We have embarked on a joint-research with C****E, which provides independent research and analysis on political issues. Stay cautious pre elections, stick to apolitical names with growth/dividends.

C****E's key conclusion: BN (ruling alliance) should win about 137 parliamentary seats, +/- 5%, a majority of between 58-64%.

Non-consensus views include:-

1) PM Najib will not be challenged from within so long as UMNO retains more than 78 seats,

2) Malay middle ground voters have swung in favour of BN, more so after Bersih 3.0 rally

3) market is concerned with the 2.3MM new registered voters who may vote against BN, but most of the new voters are registered in Johor, Selangor and Perak, where seats are already lost to the Opposition, where

4) More votes do not necessarily mean more seats for ... PR (opposition alliance).

Positive scenarios: C****E outlines five scenarios, J.P. Mo**an analyses market impact.

Scenario A (BN wins 61% of seats, status quo),

2 Scenario B (BN wins >61% but short of a two thirds majority),

3 Scenario C (BN wins two thirds majority); all suggest policy continuity and an expected short term relief rally (big rally for outcome C). Sectors that benefit the most longer-term should include: Construction and Oil & Gas directly, and Banks, Property and Media indirectly. Top picks in these sectors include: IJM, Dialog, CIMB, IJM Land and Media Prima.

4 Neutral / negative scenarios: Scenario D (BN wins 50-61%). Negative for market if <55%.

55% to 61% (provided PM Najib is not challenged from within) neutral for market given policy continuity, hence similar picks as above.

Scenario D (PR wins): Sell and stay away, potential policy changes breed uncertainty.

Most impacted sectors : construction, property, transportation, gaming and stocks with

perceived government linkages.

Key stocks affected include: Tenaga, YTL Power, MMC, Gamuda, IJM, WCT, MRCB.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jom berjuang bersama rakan bloggers di Facebook!

Tunjukkan sokongan anda! Sila Like.

OutSyed The Box

OutSyed The Box

No comments:

Post a Comment

Eksklusif Oleh :

Lagi...Bongkar!