OutSyed The Box

OutSyed The Box


Of Vassalage, Fiefs And Zaid Ibrahim's New Book

Posted: 25 Aug 2012 09:51 PM PDT

Thanks to The Star here, I found out today that Zaid Ibrahim has done something even more interesting, he has written another book, one which I believe will be largely unread (nor understood) by its proper audience. Firstly because it is in English and secondly because reading non fiction, non cerita hantu, non cerita romantik and non religious books are an anathema to large sections of the population.  

I have not read it yet but it appears to be a brave book because it touches on the Malay Royals. Here is the report, which I have truncated (I believe that huge parts of the interview with Zaid have also been left out by the Editors of The Star) :
  • A welcome read on a delicate topic
  • The role of the Malay Rulers in a constitutional monarchy is discussed in plain talk in a new book titled "Ampun Tuanku: A Brief Guide to Constitutional Government"
  • Many of us are still unaware that: The Constitution is the supreme law of the land;
  • Ampun Tuanku, authored by Datuk Zaid Ibrahim.. should kick-start the reader's journey into asking questions and finding constitutional answers to questions like: What are the characteristics of a 21st century Malay Ruler? 
  • Ampun Tuanku has chronicled several events through Malaysia's history where the Malay Rulers have played a welcome and, at times, not so welcome part.
  • Zaid's.. latest literary contribution to society  may open up the path for a mature discussion by all those upon whom Malaysia's future is invested.

  • What is the rulers' responsibility to the people in our constitution?
  • Zaid : It is to allow the people's sovereignty, the people's power to surface. .. the ultimate sovereignty is in the people.

  • And if they don't?
  • Zaid :  They have to. This is a democracy. That is why I quoted King Bhumibol (of Thailand). He said his job is to respect the right of the people to decide. He cannot say "I know better because I am King." He does not know better. It is important for a King, in a democracy, to realise the importance of being humble. 

  • Do our rulers have lessons in the Constitution? Should they learn it as children?
  • Zaid :  The problem is that no one wants to tell the Ruler he is wrong. ... . For example, in a democracy, when you appoint a Mentri Besar, you have to appoint the person that has the support of the House. But if a certain Ruler departs from that principle, the political leadership should stand up to that. If you don't, you have set the precedent for the next Ruler. Rules can only become cemented by being put into practice, by being observed.

  • We hear of members of the royal family getting enmeshed in business deals, vying with the rakyat for a slice of the same economic pie. 
  • Zaid : The head of the state should not be in business because business brings conflict. It will make him obligated to make compromises. . .  they can earn their keep by doing things for society like monarchs in other parts of the world.

  • Should their expenses be made public?
  • Zaid :  Well, they are made public in other parts of the world, why not here?

  • Is royal "activism" welcome, especially from the younger royals?
  • Zaid :  .. as much as they have the right to tell someone to shut up, the people should have the right to tell them when they are wrong.

  • Have your views about the monarchy changed 
  • Zaid :  My views about the monarchy have never changed. ...strong support for (Tun Dr) Mahathir in 1993, he felt that the Malay Rulers should be accountable and should not have unlimited rights or unrestrained powers. There were certain Rulers who were in clear violation of the law. 
OK, here are my comments. I dont know if Zaid's book discusses the word "feudal" or "feudalism".  One dictionary equates feudalism with vassalage (vassal) and fiefs.

"vassalagealso fief. Also called: feudal system  the legal and social system that evolved in W Europe in the 8th and 9th centuries, in which vassals were protected and maintained by their lords, usually through the granting of fiefs, and were required to serve under them in war."

Well I dont think this system developed in Europe alone or only in the 8th century.  Its been around for a long time.  The much earlier Chinese concept of 'son of heaven' emperors, later copied by the Japanese emperors is preceded by the "sons of god" kings of Sumeria, Pharaonic Egypt and a dozen other civilisations - which were all feudal societies.  Later this "son of god" idea took on an even larger and dramatic role.

A necessary part of feudalism is of course the "aura" of the kings and emperors. When a king was born the birds would sing, the hippos would stop for a minute, the sun would shine on Mount Sorak, the rivers would flow backwards, three wise men with high IQs would turn up for the birthday and stuff like that. That was the "aura". No "aura" no king. 

Later in the evolving Middle Ages and especially after the Renaissance, feudalism in Europe changed to become less "aura based" and more "economy" based. Here is another dictionary definition of feudalism.

feu‧dal‧is‧m :  a system which existed in the Middle Ages, in which people received land and protection from a lord when they worked and fought for him

Well its the same as the other definition but more concise. The advent of gunpowder and musketry put an end to the age of the European knights in shining armour - who were mostly gangsters hired to enforce the kings "aura". Gunpowder forced feudalism to evolve.  The gangster knights in shining armour were retired. Soon, the king  could command the loyalty of his subjects only if he could dish out the economic goodies, the "royal largesse".  The age of the "kings aura" died a natural death. 

And then in 1649 Oliver Cromwell chopped off the head of King Charles in England. 140 years later in 1789 the French chopped off the heads of not just their king but a sizeable number of their "aristocrats" (The 'sacres aristos'  of The Scarlet Pimpernel). Ever since then the European monarchs lost not only their "auras" but also the power for granting "royal largesse".  They became "constitutional monarchs". There were some die hard 'I wont let go' types in Russia.  They finally bit the dust in 1917. The Russian people then ate their cake.

For a time after that the European royals were at a loss about what to do, until the invention of the pocket camera and package tours. 


Now they also make intermittent appearances on the front pages but not always for the best of reasons (click here and here). 

As Zaid has pointed out, Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy. The Royals have little or no means to grant 'royal largesse' anymore.  And even in the past, the "aura" of a royal held more sway upon subjects of the State or within State boundaries.  

OK folks, from The Star report, I like this line best : "Zaid's.. latest literary contribution to society  may open up the path for a mature discussion by all those upon whom Malaysia's future is invested." 

I hope so too. There are still so many immature people around.  This is indeed a delicate topic. I will not entertain any rude or sarcastic comments.  And absolutely no lese majeste. It is a requirement of the Law.  

Akhir kalam : The ebb and flow of politics aside, Zaid Ibrahim has a reasonable head on his shoulders. I hope Zaid will be "rehabilitated" in the nearest future.  Dr Mahathir said that he admires people who write books.  Of course he meant good books. 

Neil Armstrong Dies

Posted: 25 Aug 2012 07:17 PM PDT




CINCINNATI (AP) — Neil Armstrong was a quiet self-described nerdy engineer who became a global hero when as a steely-nerved pilot he made "one giant leap for mankind" with a small step on to the moon. The modest man who had people on Earth entranced and awed from almost a quarter million miles away has died. He was 82.

Armstrong commanded the Apollo 11 spacecraft that landed on the moon July 20, 1969. "That's one small step for (a) man, one giant leap for mankind," Armstrong said.

Armstrong was born Aug. 5, 1930, on a farm near Wapakoneta in western Ohio. He took his first airplane ride at age 6 and developed a fascination with aviation that prompted him to build model airplanes and conduct experiments in a homemade wind tunnel.  He was licensed to fly at 16, before he got his driver's license.

Armstrong enrolled in Purdue University to study aeronautical engineering. 

From 1982 to 1992, Armstrong was chairman of Charlottesville, Va.-based Computing Technologies for Aviation Inc., a company that supplies computer information management systems for business aircraft.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jom berjuang bersama rakan bloggers di Facebook!

Tunjukkan sokongan anda! Sila Like.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...