JUST READ! |
Posted: 20 Aug 2013 01:47 PM PDT They opposition, especially DAP is blaming the police again for 'murdering' the five suspected criminals in Penang a few days ago, and that a special inquiry must be set up to investigate the 'brutality'. Although the police discovered three guns and bullets from the apartment where the shootings took place, DAP insisted that the five were 'slaughtered' without having the chance to surrender. In other words, they accused the police of having the intention to 'shoot and kill' them. Worst still, they stood by the families of the suspected criminals, offering them condolences and sympathy and telling them that the police did not abide by the standard operation procedure (SOP) when carrying out the operation. Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department P Waythamoorthy also questioned the police explanation that five suspected 04 gang members in Penang were killed in a shootout, suggesting that they were shot at point blank range. The Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) chairman said it appeared that police did not shoot the five dead in self-defence, an answer he claimed police usually gave in such instances. "Looking at the photos, I do not think anyone in the right frame of mind would believe that there was actually a shootout between the police team and suspects," he said in a statement.To Wayta, it was a 'clean execution' by the police. And he did not believe in what the police believes that the dead were also involved in several killings throughout the country. And read what some self-proclaimed 'good lawyers' said about the Crime Prevention Act that provides the police with the power to 'keep' suspected 'king criminals' for 72 days to facilitate investigation. Invoking the Crime Prevention Act 1959 to solve crimes will only leave it open to abuse because some of the law's provisions are not only vague but also allow the police to act on their own accord, legal experts warned.I personally believe that those who requested for an inquest over the Penang case and opposed the possibility of invoking the Crime Prevention Act are those who love cheap publicity and cheap thrill by making public their stand 'to be with the criminals'. These are the group of 'decayed brain' who would like to see the police attending to their duty without carrying guns. The police personnel are depicted as 'cruel and heartless' as compared to the notorious murderers, drug dwellers, rapists and robbers. They always want to be seen as championing the rights of the criminals rather than taking up the responsibility to represent the victims of major crimes in court. What a shame! They couldn't care less about the crime victims, let alone extending sympathy and condolences to the bereaved families. We seldom read about lawyers offering their services to crime victims because they don't have much money to spend on legal matters. Now we understand why they love representing the criminals themselves. Its all about big money - bank robbers, drug pushers, murderers and others. Each time they win such a case, their pockets swell. That explains everything, right? They honor crime and criminals... for money! |
Posted: 20 Aug 2013 01:18 AM PDT I almost spilled my coffee after reading PAS vice-president Salahuddin Ayub's call for Putrajaya to play a mediator role in the Egyptian conflict, which has seen thousands killed since last month. No, I am not hitting at Salahuddin but the nature of 'conscience' among PAS and PKR leaders of late for the crisis, when at one time they were too obsessed with the 'Egyptian revolution' and wanted to emulate Tahrir Square uprising. Not only me but the whole nation and the whole world remember how Anwar Ibrahim, Nik Aziz, Mat Sabu, Salahuddin and their partners in DAP and Bersih really looked up at the Egyptians, lauding them as being brave enough to change their leadership by taking to the streets and 'battling' the security forces. Why such a sudden concern now? Weren't they the ones who joined hands with Ambiga's Bersih rallies, making it a 'trial platform' to launch their a la Egypt political revolution? Hard to explain, right? So, which revolution are they turning to now after seeing too many destruction in Egypt? I thought they like such an approach! |
You are subscribed to email updates from JUST READ! To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Jom berjuang bersama rakan bloggers di Facebook!
Tunjukkan sokongan anda! Sila Like.
No comments:
Post a Comment