tun faisal dot com |
| Hanya Melayu yang dibeli, #GilaKuasa dan Bukan Melayu yang rasis percayakan DAP #PenipuRakyat Posted: 07 Jun 2012 05:00 AM PDT Nota: Kata dua orang Melayu yang dibeli DAP - "Saya orang Melayu, saya orang Islam, dan saya percaya bahawa DAP boleh pelihara kedudukan istimewa Orang Melayu dan Bumiputera, Institusi Raja-raja Melayu, agama Islam dan aqidah umat Islam lebih baik dari UMNO dan parti Islam yang lain". Errr, ada Melayu bodoh yang percayakan ni? Nasib mereka berdua pun belum tentu lagi dalam DAP tu. Apakah DAP lebih demokratik daripada UMNO? Antara DAP, Pas dan PKR, yang mana lebih demokratik? Baca artikel di bawah untuk kenali wajah DAP yang sebenar..... Ideological weaknesses of DAP leadership Posted on June 5, 2012 I found a few pages of brief analysis on list of ideological weaknesses of the DAP leadership recently. I thought I would share some of the points to the readers out there. It is an old document – written in 1995. Therefore, all of the events quoted and examples given were not up to date to the current political environment. Nevertheless, readers could appreciate the fact that history tends to repeat itself. Some with different actors with similar issues and some with same old actors but with different issues. ————————————————————– 1. "DAP-itis": A Form of Political Sickness within DAP Leadership Symptoms: They preach democracy, human rights and freedom, greater liberalisation but within DAP its national leaders do not tolerate dissent, constructive criticisms and especially by Lim Kit Siang's dictatorial rule as DAP Secretary General following Goh Hock Guan's being ousted from the post. In Parliament, DAP national leaders "acted" and projected their public images as if they are loyal and principled "Malaysian leaders" who are impeccably honest, incorruptible, and a peolpe's champion. Yet, DAP leaders suffer from "DAP-itis" during their overseas missions by bad mouthing Malaysia, conspired with left-wing union and labour organisations to disrupt congenial relationship between Malaysian government and local labour unions, threatening job positions (eg. GSP withdrawal, union strikes etc), spreading lies, rumours, and character assassinations in the name of human rights and freedom. In 1966, former DAP secretary general C.V. Devan Nair set list if "do's and don't" for DAP: a) "A strictly non-racial approach to all social, economic, political and cultural problems of Malaysia." Comment: Today, it is habitual for DAP to exploit racially sensitive issues and with forked tongues. Playing one community against the other to gain political mileage. b) "Acceptance of the Malaysian Constitution and loyalty to constitutional methods of political action." Comment: Today, DAP resorts to "foreign support" to exert international pressure in blackmailing our government to conform to DAP's demands. DAP resorts to "protest rallies", union strikes, disloyal methods of political actions at international forums and gatherings, often used for self vested purposes such as saving their own leaders from ISA detention. c) "Honesty and incorruptibility in private life and public activities." Comment: Since Lim Kit Siang's leadership, DAP leaders have unquestionably been involved in cooperative scandals, unaccountability in collecting public funds in the name of Bukit China, education and legal aid. There is completely no accountability after the funds had been collected, how it was spent, by who, and for what purpose? Receipts were not kept and one wonders any records were made and yet the DAP has the cheek to demand BN leaders to declare their personal assets while DAP national leaders openly fail in fulfilling the responsibility of public accountability in collection of public funds and refusing to set examples. And recently DAP leaders in the Trade Union were charged for misused of funds. d) "No cheap slogan shouting, rabble rousing or playing to the gallery." Comment: Not only has the DAP leaders failed to comply the abovementioned, DAP members of parliament resort to abusing Parliamentary privileges by "behaving like schoolboys" such as name calling, walking out of parliamentary sessions in protest, slandering, launching personal vendetta against BN MPs, issuing personal challenges and staging "political gimmicks" during parliamentary sessions. In 1978, DAP was known as the "Walkout Oppositon" for its blind attitude and constant walkouts in Parliament and State Assemblies so much so that staging walkouts was their way of representing the constituents. Since Lim Kit Siang took over the reigns of DAP leadership, a 'new chaotic" dimension was added into the Malaysian Parliament with his lackadaisical fashions. The DAP should reform itself by not using the Parliamentary privileges to launch character assassinations and malicious lies before shouting for Parliamentary reforms, and start to act responsibly in its representation to the electorate. To cover its record of treating the Parliament like a coffeeshop, DAP hypocritically called for the BN government to reform parliamentary procedures. Yet electoral history has amply proven that DAP is more interested in winning electoral seats than representing them! For decades, Kit Siang has been arrogantly boasting that DAP leaders have sacrificed their personal lives and freedom to speak out fearlessly for Malaysian democracy, yet when they are detained under the ISA for threatening national security, the DAP sent telegrams and letters to all over the world to denounce the Malaysian government, and like "cry babies" moaned and groaned about their predicament, seeking world sympathies and pressure to seek their releases! DAP leaders' personal behaviours are a great contradiction to their false public images as "heroes" and voters must explode this myth which the opposition has repeatedly projected to deceive the public at large! 2. DAP preaches political ideals but applies double standards within In 1967, Lim Kit Siang preached democratic socialism to strive for a society and members equal opportunities for political, economic, social and cultural development. He condemned the Feudal society where men occupy ranks in life not because they perform any socially useful function but because of their births. Does DAP national line-up today reflects the very principles preached by Lim Kit Siang 28 years ago? Chen Man Hin and Lim Kit Siang are the DAP national Chairman and Secretary General respectively today as they were 28 years ago. Malaysia since then has changed Prime Minister thrice and its cabinet line up many times over. DAP's leadership history is littered with bitter expulsions and personal vendetta with recent cases of former DAP leaders Lee Lam Thye and Hu Sepang being forced out of political positions. Today, Lim Guan Eng, DAP Youth DAPSY Chief, by birth right as Kit Siang's son, is being groomed by his father, has a tremendous bright future to lead the opposition DAP. DAP professes political ideals as a political weapon to attack others but never applies within because DAP does not believe in "practising what they professes". The public has been misled that DAP is the champion for democracy and democracy is within DAP but democracy has been dead within DAP for a long time. DAP rank and file have no "human rights" to dissent against the mistakes and misdeeds of their leaders though they might be "freed" to do so through expulsion. Former DAP National vice chairman Daing Ibrahim in 1978, quit the DAP, describing the party being run by a handful of dictators, who had arbitrarily expelled political opponents from within. He had exposed Kit Siang's true colour and "DAP's own brand of democracy". Malaysians have been taken for a ride for too long to believe that DAP is the champion of democracy and political freedom. It is time DAP should put its own house in order before shouting for democratisation, liberalisation and freedom of sorts! DAP crises in 1978, 1979, 1981, 1982 and 1990, had left a trial of desertions, defections and expulsions with open confessions of dictatorship and double standards of Kit Siang and his warlords. The record of sacked DAP top ranking leaders included staunched DAP leaders, DAP founder leaders and DAP leaders who had condemned the Alliance and BN governments. Lee Lam Thye and Hu Speang were only the latest additions and lineage to the long long list of former DAP leaders who finally woke up after a long, long political nightmare! 3. DAP: A record of self contradictions and selling out The DAP, since its founding, has shouted for a 'Malaysian Malaysia' concept, not out of sincerity to the idea, but only as an election strategy and platform to capture votes. Till today, the DAP's political concept merely exists in print and form. During the mid-1960s till up to the late 70s, DAP national leadership had to face widespread dissatisfactions and grievances among its supporters, that DAP never practised what it preached. Outside of its own homefront (DAP Party), its national leaders shouted the slogan of a Malaysian Malaysia. Within its frontiers, preferential treatment was given to DAP chinese leaders and supporters while ignoring the pleads of other communities within its rank and file. In 1978, DAP announcing its intention to absorb 20,000 malays into the party within 5 years, was looked upon as a political joke. In actual fact, it was a "cover up" to hide the reality of many malays leaving the DAP in 1978. Today's DAP remains a party that does not reflect the Malaysian Malaysia ideology, though at ground level, DAP leaders play a chauvinistic line to the tilt to deceive voters for their votes. In 1969, former DAP national leader Lee Lam Thy strongly condemned the Alliance Government: (Quote Malay Mail 3rd April 1969): "The Alliance government is dictatorial by its 'one voice policy', undemocratic and unparliamentary in its practice of parliamentary democracy; intolerant of Opposition criticism; incompetent in its administration; wasteful in its expenditure; divisive in its nation building policies; shortsighted in its treatment of the people" (unquote). Little did Lee Lam Thye realised at that time that 21 years later, his criticisms and condemnations made against the Alliance were applicable to Kit Siang and his warlords. In 1990, Lam Thye quit DAP and wept openly, a disillusioned man. In 1983 and 1985, two disillusioned DAP leaders summed up the following comments on DAP before they quit the opposition Party: a) Former DAP Youth leader (Perak): DAP lacks democracy, practices favouritism, double standards and opportunism. DAP leaders are dictatorial and hypocritical with passing weeks. They are the greatest political circus in Malaysia with threats, undemocratic restrictions, suspensions and expulsions. The DAP has lost its bearings and soul because it is being led by power crazy and autocratic individuals. A former DAP from Penang once summed up DAP leadership as "DAP has talked a lot about democracy but there is nothing in the party that is democratic at all." b) Former DAP State Treasurer (Melaka): (Quote) "The DAP's activities are a danger to national unity and harmony among the different races in the country. The DAP should realise its mistakes as its efforts to harass the people and create disunity among them were totally rejected by the people." In 1972, hundreds of DAP members quit DAP partly attributed by disillusionments and sackings carried out by Lim Kit Siang. Popular former DAP national leaders to quit DAP included Lee Lam Thye and Hu Sepang during the 1990s. On August 3rd 1971, an entire DAP committee of the Melaka branch resigned en bloc. In 1972, the former deputy publicity secretary Encik Ainnol Jammal (DAP KL Branch quit DAP citing DAP as a chauvinistic party run by a dictator. In the same year, DAP Rocket adopted a chauvinistic approach by publishing an MCA official wearing a songkok and captioned it "the fighter ans saviour of chinese culture and education". Minister of National Unity the late Tun Sambathan chided DA for stooping to such a low form to score political points. In 1986, DAP carried out the chauvinistic and dirty tactic by concocting printed photographs of an MCA candidate wearing songkok and mass distributed to voters during the general elections. Since Lim Kit Siang took over the reigns of DAP leadership, the DAP is infamous for whipping up communal feelings and character assassinations for its selfish political ends. In 1971, V. David (currently DAP national leader) who was with Gerakan had a verbal clash with former DAP leader Goh Hock Guan on the Selangor State Assembly meeting. V. David accused the DAP of playing "cowboy politics" and power crazy. Today, the same V. David is a DAP national leader who perpetuates the cowboy politics and supports "power crazy" DAP policies. On 22nd April 1974, 102 DAP members from 5 branches in Selangor, resigned en bloc citing Kit Siang's "dictatorial ways" as the chief reason for their resignations. (Quote): "In our investigations, we (former DAP supporters) found that Kit Siang was trying to keep power to himself by getting rid of people who did not agree with him. The DAP Constitution was changed to allow Kit Siang to assume more personal power and to mould the DAP according to his will" (unquote). It is evident that Lim Kit Siang calls for greater liberalisation and democratisation today is hypocritical move when the DAP ideals which he personally refuses to practice and apply within his own political homefront. Voters must wake up to DAP's hypocrisy and double standards which Lim Kit Siang steadfastly upholds for the past 28 years of his dictatorial rule . To ensure that the DAP Youth perpetuates this Hitler's doctrine, he puts his son and future DAP successor, Lim Guan Eng to indoctrinate the younger DAP members and pro-DAP youth movements with anti-government and anti-establishment policies of the opposition.   |
| #SCORPENE: Kes tak dibicara, SUARAM sudah panas bontot? Posted: 06 Jun 2012 11:55 PM PDT Wang sudah angkat, mau tak mau kena bikin kecoh? Elok audit akaun SUARAM. GEMPAR!: Tiada Perbicaraan Tentang Kapal Selam Scorpene di Perancis Isu kapal selam scorpene yang ditimbulkan oleh SUARAM a.k.a pembangkang, telah berlanjutan sejak aduan dibuat mengenainya di mahkamah Perancis pada November 2009. Secara ringkasnya, SUARAM telah menuduh bahawa syarikat pembuat iaitu DCNS dari Perancis telah membayar rasuah sejumlah EURO114 juta kepada syarikat Perimekar Sdn Bhd dari Malaysia dengan kerjasama seorang model dari Mongolia, Altantuya Sharibuu, yang kemudiannya dibunuh kejam kerana meminta bahagiannya. Menurut kenyataan Pengarah SUARAM, Dr. Kua Kia Soong, "SUARAM percaya terdapat sesuatu yang lebih besar di sebalik pembunuhan Altantuya dan ianya ialah persoalan tentang sekurang-kurangnya RM500 million komisen di atas RM7 billion pembelian kapal selam scorpene." Secara tidak langsung, namun jelas lagi terang, Dr. Kua menuduh bahawa kerajaan atau Perdana Menteri terlibat dalam rasuah dan juga pembunuhan. SUARAM juga membuat beberapa kenyataan lanjutan dan berterusan membayangkan bahawa kes ini kini sedang dibicarakan di mahkamah Perancis. Malah, SUARAM juga menyeru sumbangan rakyat Malaysia untuk membantu mereka menanggung kos kes ini di mahkamah Perancis. Untuk itu, SUARAM mengadakan majlis makan malam dengan jualan meja semahal RM10,000 - pastinya, untuk menutup jejak bahawa mereka didalangi dan ditaja oleh sesuatu pihak untuk menipu. Tidak dapat dipastikan berapa kerat rakyat Malaysia yang telah menyumbang kepada SUARAM untuk memanjangkan fitnah tersebut. Kita tidak yakin ada rakyat yang sebegitu bodoh untuk menaja SUARAM 'makan-angin' ke Perancis. Tetapi, jika ada yang telah menyumbang, inilah disarankan agar mereka mendesak SUARAM disiasat dan diaudit untuk mendapatkan kembali wang mereka. Ini kerana, sumber-sumber terkini memaklumkan bahawa kes kapal selam scorpene ini, pada hakikatnya tidak pun dibawa ke mahkamah Perancis. Mengikut undang-undang Perancis, sistem kehakimannya membolehkan hakim menyiasat atau menyelidik sesuatu kes secara bebas. Hakim juga boleh menyoal saksi, orang yang disyaki dan mengarahkan siasatan bagi mengumpul fakta dan bukti. Dimaklumkan juga bahawa dalam kes kontrak penjualan kapal selam yang ditandatangani oleh DCN dengan Pakistan dan Taiwan, keraguan yang berbangkit ialah bahawa rasuah yang berlaku adalah melibatkan DCN dengan parti politik Perancis. Hakikatnya, Pejabat Pendakwaraya Paris ada melakukan siasatan berkenaan penjualan kapal selam yang membabitkan DCN dengan negara-negara lain termasuk Malaysia dan tumpuan siasatan mereka adalah antara DCN dengan ahli-ahli atau parti politik Perancis. Aduan SUARAM telah diambilkira dalam skop siasatan ini. Justeru, apa yang digambarkan oleh SUARAM bahawa kerajaan Malaysia telah diheret ke mahkamah Perancis dan Perdana Menteri kita akan disapina adalah bohong sama sekali. Isu pembelian scorpene oleh Malaysia tidak pernah dibawa ke mahkamah dan segala kenyataan akhbar dan taklimat oleh SUARAM mengenainya adalah berdasarkan penipuan semata-mata. Seharusnya, isu rasuah scorpene ini tidak timbul langsung memandangkan penafian dan penjelasan terperinci secara berfakta telah pun dibuat berkali-kali di parlimen. Selain itu, Dato' Seri Najib sendiri telah bersumpah sebanyak 4 kali menyatakan tidak mengenali Altantuya dan alibinya serta Datin Seri Rosmah pada waktu kejadian juga amat kukuh sekali. Malah, penyebar fitnah tersebut, iaitu Raja Petra Kamaruddin (RPK) juga telah tampil membuat pengakuan bahawa dia hanya mereka-reka cerita. Namun, SUARAM tetap tegar untuk memainkan isu yang tidak ada ini seolah-olah begitu terdesak sekali untuk memburukkan kerajaan. Kita berkata demikian, kerana jika tujuan mereka bukan untuk memburukkan kerajaan, mereka sewajarnya tidak berbuat bising dan menunggu sahaja perbicaraan selesai. Bagaimanapun kini kita faham masalah SUARAM yang tidak boleh duduk diam, iaitu kerana kes tersebut tidak dibicarakan pun! Tujuan SUARAM menipu tidak sukar untuk dibaca kerana SUARAM dan pembangkang merupakan satu entiti yang sama. Memandangkan jangkahayat pembangkang hanya bergantung kepada kehebatan mereka menipu maka mereka melihat tiada salahnya mengambil risiko jika penipuan mereka dikantoikan dalam isu scorpene ini, kerana yakin penyokong-penyokong tegar mereka tetap akan percaya apa saja - sekurang-kurangnya sehingga pilihanraya selesai. Dengan pilihanraya semakin hampir, scorpene adalah satu-satunya isu yang mampu digunakan untuk terus mengelirukan pengundi agar meragui kepimpinan Dato' Seri Najib. sumber: Beruang Biru   |
| You are subscribed to email updates from tun faisal dot com To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Jom berjuang bersama rakan bloggers di Facebook!
Tunjukkan sokongan anda! Sila Like.
No comments:
Post a Comment